Arroyo v. City of Buffalo et al
| Adam Arroyo |
| City of Buffalo, City of Buffalo Police Department, Daniel Derenda, John Garcia, Brenda Callahan, City of Buffalo Police Department Narcotics Division, Joseph Cook and Michael DeGeorge |
| 1:2015cv00753 |
| August 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| Richard J. Arcara |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
DECISION AND ORDER. Defendants shall within five days of this Decision and Order provide copies of the Section 4.0 (Sections 4.1 4.7) without redactions of the MOP and Section 3.0 (Sections 3.1 3.9) with redactions of Sections 3.5(C)(3) relating to currency seizures and 3.6, relating to procedures for seizing evidence of the Operations Manual, which are not responsive to Interrogatory No. 14. Upon receiving such materials, Plaintiff's counsel agrees to abide fully with the terms with the protective order as described herein. Plaintiff's counsel shall acknowledge such receipt and agreement by filing within three days thereafter a copy of this Decision and Order endorsed by Plaintiff's counsel where provided. Any violations of such protective order will be treated at the courts discretion as a criminal or civil contempt. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 10/23/2018. (SDW)
|
|
Filing
51
DECISION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. 33) is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part; Plaintiff's request for sanctions is DENIED. Defendants shall provide the responses to Plaintiff's Interrogatories Nos. 8-12 consistent with this Decision and Order within 30 days; Defendants shall submit documents responsive to Interrogatory No. 14 to the court for in camera review within 14 days. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 9/13/2018. (SDW)
|
|
Filing
41
DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio's Report and Recommendation 30 . The City Defendants' Rule 12(c) motion 15 directed to Plaintiff's First, Second, Third, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Claims against the C ity Defendants is granted in part and denied in part, as specified in the Report and Recommendation; the Individual Defendants' Rule 12(c) motion as to Plaintiff's First, Third, and Seventh Claims against the Individual Defendants is grante d in part and denied in part, as specified in the Report andRecommendation; and the Defendants' alternative motion for summary judgment isdismissed without prejudice. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Foschio for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 1/20/2018. (LAS)
|
|
Filing
30
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 15 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Daniel Derenda, Joseph Cook, City of Buffalo Police Department Narcotics Division, The City of Buffalo, Michael DeGeorge, Brenda Callaha n, City of Buffalo Police Department, John Garcia. Objections due fourteen days from receipt. DECISION AND ORDER re 15 First MOTION for Summary Judgment First MOTION to Disqualify Counsel,First MOTION for Discovery filed by Daniel Derenda, Joseph Cook, City of Buffalo Police Department Narcotics Division, The City of Buffalo, Michael DeGeorge, Brenda Callahan, City of Buffalo Police Department, John Garcia and 23 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery filed by Adam Arroyo. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 7/20/2017. (SDW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
