Roy v. Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Western District Roy v. Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra

Roy v. Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra

Plaintiff:	Pierre Roy
Defendant:	Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra
Case Number:	1:2015cv00771
Filed:	August 28, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Buffalo Office
County:	Erie
Presiding Judge:	Richard J. Arcara
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 8, 2016	Filing 25 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio's Report and Recommendation 15 . Defendant's motion to dismiss 5 is granted. The Clerk shall take all steps necessary to close the case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 8/8/16. (LAS)
September 21, 2015	Filing 3 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Service by US Marshal; FURTHER, upon receipt of this Order, Plaintiff is required to submit the certified copy, marshal forms, summons and complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service upon name d Defendant with fee of $8.00 per summons and complaint, as specified. FURTHER, the U.S. Marshal is directed to collect their fee and serve the Summons and Complaint; FURTHER, the Clerk of Court is directed to forward a copy of the first page of the Court's Notice Regarding Service of Summons and Complaint to Plaintiff. Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 9/19/2015. (Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff, Pierre Roy). (CMD)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 8, 2016

Filing 25 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio's Report and Recommendation 15 . Defendant's motion to dismiss 5 is granted. The Clerk shall take all steps necessary to close the case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 8/8/16. (LAS)

September 21, 2015

Filing 3 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Service by US Marshal; FURTHER, upon receipt of this Order, Plaintiff is required to submit the certified copy, marshal forms, summons and complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service upon name d Defendant with fee of $8.00 per summons and complaint, as specified. FURTHER, the U.S. Marshal is directed to collect their fee and serve the Summons and Complaint; FURTHER, the Clerk of Court is directed to forward a copy of the first page of the Court's Notice Regarding Service of Summons and Complaint to Plaintiff. Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 9/19/2015. (Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff, Pierre Roy). (CMD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roy v. Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pierre Roy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?