Buczek v. Setrus LLC et al
| Deborah Ann Buczek |
| Setrus LLC, Jacob Shue, Rosicki Rosicki & Associates, P.C., HSBC N.A. USA and Jessica Bookstaver |
| 1:2016cv00268 |
| April 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| William M. Skretny |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
DECISION AND ORDER IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Seterus's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Docket No. 81) is GRANTED, and that Seterus's alternative request for summary judgment is DENIED AS MOOT.FURTHER, that leav e to file an amended complaint is DENIED, and the claims alleged against Seterus LLC and John Does and Jane Does are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.FURTHER, that this Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3) and Rule 24 (a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, that any appeal from this Decision and Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore leave to appeal as a poor person is DENIED. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 82 S. Ct. 9 17, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962).FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this decision to Plaintiff at her address of record.FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.SO ORDERED.Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 3/27/2024. (JCM)Clerk to Follow up
|
|
Filing
49
DECISION AND ORDER IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 26, 29) are GRANTED.FURTHER, that leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED, and the claims alleged against Defendants HSBC Bank USA, NA; Rosicki Rosicki & Associates, P.C.; Jessica Bookstaver; Angela Venner; and Tina M. Genovese are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.FURTHER, that Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Discovery (Docket No. 40) is DENIED.FURTHER, that the request to i mpose a filing injunction against Plaintiff is DENIED.FURTHER, that this Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3) and Rule 24 (a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, that any appeal from this Decision and Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore leave to appeal as a poor person is DENIED. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962).FURTHER, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Decision to Plaintiff.SO ORDERED.Issued by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 7/11/2021. (JCM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER, that the Clerk of Court shall send to Plaintiff six service packets, USM-285 forms, and six blank summonses to be completed and returned to the Clerk of Court for service by the U.S. Marshal; the Clerk of Court shall cause the U.S. Marshal to serve copies of the Summons, Amended Complaint, Court Order No. 3 and this Order upon defendants Rosicki, Genovese, HSBC N.A. USA, Venner, Bookstaver, and Seterus, LLC without plaintiff's payment therefore, unpaid fees to be recovered if this ac tion terminates by monetary award in plaintiff's favor; that any claims brought under criminal statutes, including criminal RICO, mail fraud, wire fraud, and bank fraud, are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; the following defendants Deborah C. Cox, Francis Y. King, Melissa S. Kubit, Carol L. Lockwood, Susan Moore, Cynthia G. Rosicki, Thomas P. Rosicki, Kenneth Sheehan, Jacob Shue, Eleanor Smith, Rose Vianna, William Wright, Sarah Barbo ssa and Christy Cheasty are Dismissed and terminated from this action for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim; and that any appeal from this Decision and Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore leave to appeal as a poor person is Denied. Signed by Hon. William M. Skretny on 8/27/19. (SG) Plaintiff mailed orders, summonses and service packets.
|
|
Filing
7
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 4 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 5/12/2017. (MEAL) Copy mailed to Plaintiff.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
