Brown v. 93 NYRPT, LLC
Brown and Christopher E Brown |
93 NYRPT, LLC |
1:2016cv01018 |
December 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Queens |
Lawrence J Vilardo |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 TEXT ORDER. The #13 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice is HEREBY SO ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 4/13/2017. (CMD)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Christopher E Brown. (Mussman, Louis) |
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. 93 NYRPT, LLC answer due 4/10/2017. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 3/31/2017.(APG) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by 93 NYRPT, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Defendant's Time to Answer)(Fish, Eric) |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint 93 NYRPT, LLC Answer due 3/31/2017. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 3/14/2017.(APG) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by 93 NYRPT, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Stipulation and Order Extending Defendant 93 NYRPT, LLC's Time to Answer the Complaint)(Fish, Eric) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 93 NYRPT, LLC. (Fish, Eric) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Louis I. Mussman on behalf of Christopher E Brown (Mussman, Louis) |
ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven(7) days of this notice. (MD) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting defendant's #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to plaintiff's complaint. The defendant's time to answer is extended to 3/15/2017. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 2/23/2017. (CMD) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by 93 NYRPT, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Fish, Eric) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric R. Fish on behalf of 93 NYRPT, LLC (Fish, Eric) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher E Brown. 93 NYRPT, LLC served on 2/1/2017, answer due 2/22/2017. (Donatelli, Alan) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to 93 NYRPT, LLC. (SG) |
Case assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. (SG) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution(SG) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (SG) |
Summons Issued as to 93 NYRPT, LLC. (SG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 93 NYRPT, LLC $ 400 receipt number 0209-2681452, filed by Christopher E Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Donatelli, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.