The Buffalo New York OSHA Area Office v. In the Matter of the Establishment Inspection of Allegheny Ludlum, LLC
The Buffalo New York OSHA Area Office |
In the Matter of the Establishment Inspection of Allegheny Ludlum, LLC |
1:2016mc00008 |
March 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
H. Kenneth Schroeder |
Other |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The Buffalo New York OSHA Area Office v. In the Matter of the Establishment Inspection of Allegheny Ludlum, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: The Buffalo New York OSHA Area Office | |
Represented By: | Evan R. Barouh |
Represented By: | Michael S. Cerrone |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Scott Rogoff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: In the Matter of the Establishment Inspection of Allegheny Ludlum, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.