Brown v. Correction Officer et al
| Homer Brown |
| Correction Officer and Duke |
| 1:2017cv00074 |
| January 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Livingston |
| Frank P. Geraci |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
DECISION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 14 is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Defendant Cronin as a party to this action and amend the caption in accordance with this Order. One claim remains against Defen dant Serediuk for allegedly violating Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment rights inside the elevator on December 13, 2016. In a subsequent order, the Court will refer this action to a magistrate judge for pretrial proceedings. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 2/14/2019. A copy of this NEF and Decision and Order have been sent to the pro se Plaintiff. (AFM)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Plaintiff's Letter Requests, in that his request for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and his request for an extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response is now due by 11/30/2018. Defendants may file a reply within 15 days after Plaintiff's response is filed. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 10/22/2018. A copy of the order will be sent to the pro se Plaintiff. (MFM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
