Kochan v. Schawbenbauer et al
Christopher Kochan |
Bryan H Schawbenbauer, Matthew H Albanese and Amber S Graham |
1:2017cv00452 |
May 22, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Cattaraugus |
Christina Clair Reiss |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 ORDER denying Defendants request for a court conference and Ordering Plaintiff to provide Defendants Albanese and Graham with a completed W-9 form within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. Thereafter, Defendants Albanese and Graham shall have five(5) business days to send Plaintiff $6,000 as ordered by the court. In the event that Plaintiff's appeal is successful, Defendants Albanese and Graham shall return the W-9 to Plaintiff and Plaintiff shall return the $6,000 to Defendants Albanese and Graham. re 105 First MOTION for Settlement. Signed by Hon. Christina Reiss on 8/3/2020. (JLV) |
Filing 45 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' motions to dismiss 22 , 25 , 28 , 29 . Plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim (Count III), his substantive due process claim (Count IV), and his unlawful imprisonment claim (Count V) are dismissed; the court denies Officers Albanese and Graham's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's false imprisonment claim (Count I). Signed by Hon. Christina Clair Reiss on 8/13/2018. (KLH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.