Abdi v. Duke, et al.
| Thomas Brophy, Jeffrey Searls, Jefferson Sessions and Elaine C Duke |
| Hanad Abdi and Johan Barrios Ramos |
| 1:2017cv00721 |
| July 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| Elizabeth A. Wolford |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
201
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 01/05/2022. (CDH) (A copy of this Order was mailed to Petitioner Hanad Abdi at his last known address) -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
193
DECISION AND ORDER granting 189 MOTION for Preliminary Approval of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Notice and scheduling Final Approval Hearing for 12/15/2021 at 2:00 p.m. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 10/22/2021. (CDH)
|
|
Filing
151
DECISION AND ORDER granting 102 Motion to Decertify Subclass; denying as moot 91 Motion to Vacate Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 122 Motion to Enforce Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 09/24/2019. (CDH)
|
|
Filing
129
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part 122 Petitioners' Motion to Enforce Preliminary Injunction and Class Reporting Order by Hanad Abdi, Johan Barrios Ramos to the extent that Respondents are hereby ordered to produce a witness or witnesses for deposition within thirty (30) days of this Court's Decision and Order who has personal knowledge of the methodology being used by Respondents to identify and report class members and who can testify concerning any changes made or that will be ma de by Respondents to address the recurring errors in the identification of class members. The Court otherwise reserves decision on the remaining aspects of the motion and all parties shall plan on addressing these issues at the upcoming oral argument scheduled for May 15, 2019. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 4/30/2019. (DPS)
|
|
Filing
83
DECISION AND ORDER granting 67 Motion for clarification. The Court clarifies that the November 17, 2017, Decision requires that once an IJ has determined that a detainee shall be released on bond, he or she must consider the financial circumstanc es of each subclass member and alternative conditions of release in setting the amount of bond. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that for all subclass members provided a bond hearing pursuant to the Court's November 17, 2017, Decision, the I J, when setting the terms of any subclass member's release at a bond hearing, must consider alternative conditions of release and the individual's ability to pay; and it is further ORDERED that for those subclass members who have already received a bond hearing pursuant to the November 17, 2017, Decision who remained detained notwithstanding an IJ's determination that release on bond would be appropriate, bond hearings must be recalendared and the record reopened for the IJ to consider alternative conditions of release and the individual's ability to pay; and it is further ORDERED that counsel for Respondents shall notify Class Counsel of the date and location of each bond hearing set pursuant to this Decision and Order at leave five days in advance of the hearing. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 02/09/2018. (LMD) Modified on 2/9/2018 (ZML). (Main Document 83 replaced on 2/9/2018) (LMD).
|
|
Filing
56
DECISION AND ORDER denying 27 Motion to Dismiss; granting 38 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 11/17/2017. (LMD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
