Natale v. Arizona Premium Finance Co., Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Western District Natale v. Arizona Premium Finance Co., Inc.

Natale v. Arizona Premium Finance Co., Inc.

Plaintiff:	Richard Natale
Defendant:	Arizona Premium Finance Co., Inc.
Case Number:	1:2017cv00934
Filed:	September 19, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Buffalo Office
County:	Erie
Presiding Judge:	William M. Skretny
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 18, 2021	Filing 32 DECISION AND ORDER IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion (Docket No. 22) for Summary Judgment is DENIED.FURTHER, that Plaintiff's Motion (Docket No. 26) for Summary Judgment is DENIED, consistent with this dec ision.FURTHER, that this case is REFERRED for alternative dispute resolution under Section 2.1.B of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York ("the ADR Plan"). FURTHER, that the parties shall re-engage with Mediator Bruce Zeftel and participate in the mediation session as scheduled by Mr. Zeftel.FURTHER, that within 10 days of the mediation session and any subsequent sessions, the mediator shall file a M ediation Certification setting forth the progress of mediation.FURTHER, that the mediation process shall be completed by November 1, 2021.FURTHER, that the parties shall timely comply with all relevant requirements of the ADR Plan, which is ava ilable at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov. FURTHER, that the parties shall appear before this Court on Wednesday, May 26, 2021, at 9:00 AM, to report on the status of this case if it is not sooner resolved through mediation.SO ORDERED.Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 3/18/2021. (JCM)
April 3, 2019	Filing 20 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Compel. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder Jr. on 4/3/2019. (KER) Modified on 4/3/2019 (KER).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 18, 2021

Filing 32 DECISION AND ORDER IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion (Docket No. 22) for Summary Judgment is DENIED.FURTHER, that Plaintiff's Motion (Docket No. 26) for Summary Judgment is DENIED, consistent with this dec ision.FURTHER, that this case is REFERRED for alternative dispute resolution under Section 2.1.B of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York ("the ADR Plan"). FURTHER, that the parties shall re-engage with Mediator Bruce Zeftel and participate in the mediation session as scheduled by Mr. Zeftel.FURTHER, that within 10 days of the mediation session and any subsequent sessions, the mediator shall file a M ediation Certification setting forth the progress of mediation.FURTHER, that the mediation process shall be completed by November 1, 2021.FURTHER, that the parties shall timely comply with all relevant requirements of the ADR Plan, which is ava ilable at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov. FURTHER, that the parties shall appear before this Court on Wednesday, May 26, 2021, at 9:00 AM, to report on the status of this case if it is not sooner resolved through mediation.SO ORDERED.Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 3/18/2021. (JCM)

April 3, 2019

Filing 20 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Compel. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder Jr. on 4/3/2019. (KER) Modified on 4/3/2019 (KER).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Natale v. Arizona Premium Finance Co., Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Natale
Represented By:	Seth Andrews
Represented By:	Kenneth R. Hiller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Premium Finance Co., Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?