Osucha v. Alden State Bank, et al
| Ashley Osucha |
| Alden State Bank, Richard D Koelbl and John Koelbl |
| 1:2017cv01026 |
| October 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| Lawrence J. Vilardo |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion to Compel. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 6/9/2020. (GAI)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE HUGH B. SCOTTORDER re 33 Scheduling Order, Text Order, Terminate Scheduling Order Deadlines, 29 MOTION to Compel filed by Ashley Osucha, 41 Order on Motion to Exp edite, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete DiscoveryTHIRD AMENDED SCHEDULING/CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Please Note: This docket text may not contain the entire contents of the attached Order. It is your responsibility to read the attached Order and download it for future reference. Direct any questions to the Chambers of the Judge who entered this Order.)Plaintiff's Motion (Docket No. 29) is granted in part, denied i n part; Motions terminated: 29 MOTION to Compel filed by Ashley Osucha.Discovery completed by 3/30/2020.Dispositive Motions due by 6/30/2020.Mediation To End by 6/30/2020.So Ordered. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 12/12/2019. (DRH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
