Ultrapak, LLC et al v. Laninver USA, Inc. et al
| Ultrapak, LLC and Khalid M Khan |
| Laninver USA, Inc., Enric Holzbacher and Alain Zijlstra |
| 1:2018cv00561 |
| May 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Chautauqua |
| Lawrence J. Vilardo |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER granting in part 33 Motion to Dismiss. Counts One and Three of the amended complaint (Dkt. 29) are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs second amended complaint is due July 28, 2020. Defendant is directed to answer or otherwise respond to the second amended complaint by August 11, 2020. If no second amended complaint is timely filed, then Counts One and Three of the amended complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. The case is referred back to Judge Scott for further proceedings consistent with the referral order of July 17, 2018. Dkt. 11. Signed by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 7/14/2020. (CGJ)
|
|
Filing
51
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE: 33 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Laninver USA, Inc.Objections due per 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72.Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 1/9/2020. (GAI)
|
|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ORDER granting 9 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 1/17/2019. (GAI)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
