Lockridge v. Progressive Insurance, et al
| Close2DaEdge PC Technology Solutions and Vern Ramon Lockridge |
| Legi Motors and Progressive Insurance |
| 1:2018cv00814 |
| July 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| Lawrence J Vilardo |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Vern Ramon Lockridge.(KM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Legi Motors, Progressive Insurance, filed by Vern Ramon Lockridge.(KM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/26/2018: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KM). |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(KM) |
| Remark - Pro Se packet including Privacy Notice and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge mailed to plaintiff at the counter. (KM) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (KM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
