Fremont v. Sessions et al
Gary Fremont |
Jeffery B. Sessions, III, Department of Homeland Security, Thomas E. Feeley and Jeffrey J. Searls |
1:2018cv01128 |
October 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Lawrence J Vilardo |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 62271 (SG) |
Filing 3 JUDGMENT in favor of Department of Homeland Security, Jeffery B. Sessions, III, Jeffrey J. Searls, Thomas E. Feeley against Gary Fremont. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 11/8/18. (SG) |
Mailed to plaintiff final order, judgment and blank motion. (SG) |
Filing 2 ORDER case shall be administratively terminated; plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing no later than thirty days from the date of this order if he wishes to reopen the action and shall include either a motion to proceed in forma pauperis that includes an affirmation or affidavit establishing his inability to pay fees and costs or the $5.00 filing fee; upon receipt of the motion or the filing fee, the Clerk of Court shall re-open the case. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 11/7/18. (SG) |
Pro Se Packet Mailed to Plaintiff which included: Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, Civil Case Timeline. (SG) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Gary Fremont.(SG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.