Sunset Homeowners Association, Inc. et al v. DiFrancesco et al
| Glenn Arthurs and Sunset Homeowners Association, Inc. |
| Bryan DiFrancesco, Homeaway, Inc., Natascha DiFrancesco and Airbnb, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00016 |
| January 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Elizabeth A Wolford |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Insufficient Service of Process, MOTION to Vacate Temporary Restraining Order by Bryan DiFrancesco, Natascha DiFrancesco. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Affidavit, #9 Exhibit A, #10 Exhibit B, #11 Exhibit C, #12 Affidavit, #13 Memorandum in Support, #14 Certificate of Service)(Brown, Marc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony M. Kroese on behalf of Bryan DiFrancesco, Natascha DiFrancesco (Kroese, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bryan DiFrancesco, Natascha DiFrancesco from Cattaraugus County Supreme, case number 87535. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0209-3321493), filed by Bryan DiFrancesco, Natascha DiFrancesco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B - Part 1, #3 Exhibit B - Part 2, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Certificate of Service)(Brown, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
