Baez v. Whitaker et al
Petitioner: Nguyen Baez
Respondent: Jeffrey J. Seals, Matthew G. Whitaker, Department of Homeland Security and Thomas E. Feeley
Case Number: 1:2019cv00088
Filed: January 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A Wolford
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nguyen Baez.(SG)
February 25, 2019 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 63349 (SG)
February 6, 2019 Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey J. Seals, Matthew G. Whitaker, Thomas E. Feeley against Nguyen Baez. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 2/6/19. (SG) Copy mailed to plaintiff.
February 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the case shall be administratively terminated without prejudice; that plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing no later than thirty days from the date of this order if he wishes to reopen the action and shall include either a motion to proceed in forma pauperis that includes a completed and signed Prison Certification or the $5.00 filing fee; upon receipt of the new motion or the filing fee, the Clerk of Court shall re-open the case. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 2/5/19. (SG) Plaintiff mailed order and in forma pauperis motion.
January 24, 2019 E-Filing Notification: #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, relief modified. (SG)
January 16, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Nguyen Baez.(SG) Modified on 1/24/2019 to correct relief (SG).
January 16, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nguyen Baez.(SG)
January 16, 2019 Pro Se Packet Mailed to Plaintiff which included: Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Civil Case Timeline. (SG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baez v. Whitaker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey J. Seals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas E. Feeley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nguyen Baez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?