Pickering v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
| Leslie James Pickering |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Department of Justice |
| 1:2019cv00417 |
| March 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Richard J Arcara |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Justice (Attachments: #1 summons issued) (SG)
|
|
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution(SG)
|
|
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (SG)
|
|
Case assigned to Hon. Richard J. Arcara. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (SG)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants $ 400 receipt number 0209-3405676, filed by Leslie James Pickering. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Kuzma, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
