Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York
| Seneca Nation of Indians |
| State of New York |
| 1:2019cv00735 |
| June 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| William M Skretny |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MOTION /Notice of Cross-Petition by State of New York. (Attachments: #1 Cross-Petition to Confirm Partial Final Award and Corrected Final Award, #2 Memorandum in Support of Opposition to Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration Award and Cross-Petition to Confirm Partial Final Award and Corrected Final Award, #3 Declaration of Gregory M. Starner in Support, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G, #11 Exhibit H, #12 Exhibit I)(Starner, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDERIT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that the State's unopposed #7 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages is GRANTED. Pursuant to the parties' request, the State's consolidated brief shall not exceed 40 pages; the Nation's consolidated reply brief shall not exceed 40 pages; the State's reply brief shall not exceed 15 pages. Issued by United States District Judge William M. Skretny on 7/8/2019. (JCM)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages /Letter Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages by State of New York.(Starner, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER. The #5 Joint Stipulation Regarding Time to Respond to the Petition is HEREBY SO ORDERED. Oral Argument will be set by further order as determined by the Court. SO ORDERED. Issued by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 6/21/2019. (MEAL)
|
|
Filing 5
STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, / Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Time to Respond to the Petition by State of New York. (Starner, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory M Starner on behalf of State of New York (Starner, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to State of New York. (KM)
|
|
Case assigned to Hon. William M. Skretny. Notification to chambers of on-line civil opening. (KM)
|
|
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (KM)
|
|
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution(KM)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF MOTION to Vacate Final Arbitration Award by Seneca Nation of Indians. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L, #15 Exhibit M, #16 Exhibit N, #17 Exhibit O)(Heckman, Carol) Modified on 6/7/2019 (KLH). Modified document title on 6/7/2019 (KM).
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION TO VACATE FINAL ARBITRATION AWARD by Seneca Nation of Indians against State of New York $ 400 receipt number 0209-3476225, filed by Seneca Nation of Indians. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Heckman, Carol) Modified document title on 6/7/2019 (KM).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
