Stanton v. Hamilton et al
| Jason M Stanton |
| Cedric T Hamilton and M.C. Tank Transport, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00779 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Hugh B Scott |
| Lawrence J Vilardo |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Stipulation-Selection of Mediator by Cedric T Hamilton, M.C. Tank Transport, Inc.(Cross, Tara) |
| Filing 8 SCHEDULING/CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Please Note: This docket text does not contain the entire contents of the attached Order. It is your responsibility to read the attached Order and download it for future reference. Direct any questions to the Chambers of the Judge who entered this Order.)Motions to Join Parties/Amend Pleadings due by 8/16/2019. Stipulation of Selection of Mediator due by 8/16/2019. First Mediation Session due by 10/16/2019. Plaintiff Expert Witness ID due by 6/16/2020. Defendant Expert Witness ID due by 7/16/2020. Discovery completed by 7/31/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 10/30/2020. Mediation To End by 11/30/2020.Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 7/16/2019. (GAI) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Pretrial Order - Scheduling by Cedric T Hamilton, M.C. Tank Transport, Inc.. (Cross, Tara) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Cedric T. Hamilton on 6/5/2019, filed by Jason M Stanton. (Zosh, Michael) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER RE: Scheduling.On or before 8/7/2019, the parties will file a joint report that addresses the issues covered in Rules 16(c) and 26(f) and Local Rule 16(b); any issues not applicable to this case should be mentioned briefly as not applicable. The parties will meet and confer in good faith to accomplish this goal.The parties are further directed to begin Rule 26 initial disclosures immediately.The Court will issue a Scheduling Order after receiving the joint report.Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties at any time may consent to have the Magistrate Judge adjudicate individual dispositive proceedings or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or non-jury trial and entry of final judgment. (See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.) The parties are encouraged to consider potential benefits of a Rule 73 consent, including earlier motion resolution and trial scheduling; however, there will be no adverse consequences at all should the parties decline. A copy of the Court's chamber guide, also available on the WDNY website, is attached for counsel's convenience.SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 6/26/2019. (GAI) |
| Filing 4 TEXT REFERRAL ORDER (DISPOSITIVE) - Hon. Hugh B. Scott, United States Magistrate Judge, is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall also hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 6/25/2019. (CMD) |
| ADR Plan electronically forwarded to attorneys. The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution (KLH) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by M.C. Tank Transport, Inc.. (Cross, Tara) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial by Cedric T Hamilton, M.C. Tank Transport, Inc..(Cross, Tara) |
| ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven(7) days of this notice. (MD) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number BUF064712 (KLH) |
| Remark: No fee received with case opening. Filing attorney has been contacted and advised that judge assignment will not be made until filing fee is received. (KLH) |
| Case assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to chambers of on-line civil opening. (KLH) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (KLH) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution (KLH) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Niagara County Supreme Court, case number E168340/2019., filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(Cross, Tara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
