Carvalho v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Adam Lee Carvalho |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv01341 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee: $400.00, receipt number 66213 (SG) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis J. Canning on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Canning, Dennis) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff indicates that he is not employed and resides with his wife and a child. It is unclear whether the child is a minor. Plaintiff's monthly expenses of $1,675 are covered by his wife's monthly income of $2,512. Besides his child, plaintiff does not have any dependents. Based on the Court's review of plaintiff's monthly income, expenses, and the lack of dependents other than his daughter, the Court finds that plaintiff has not put forth sufficient indications of indigency, and therefore, his motion is denied. Plaintiff has until November 6, 2019 to pay the $400.00 filing fee. If plaintiff does not pay the filing fee or otherwise seek relief from this Order by November 6, 2019, the Clerk of Court will dismiss this case without prejudice without further order. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 10/7/19. (NNR)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Attached issued summons and complaint served electronically on the defendant pursuant to Western District of New York's Local Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(SG) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (SG) |
| Case placed in Social Security Assignment Pool. (SG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adam Lee Carvalho.(Hiller, Kenneth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Adam Lee Carvalho. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Hiller, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carvalho v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Dennis J. Canning |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adam Lee Carvalho | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth R. Hiller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
