Wesolowski v. Pentagon Logistics et al
| janelle wesolowski |
| pentagon logistics, Igor Chveda and Pentagon Logistics Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01532 |
| November 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Geoffrey Crawford |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT by pentagon logistics filed by pentagon logistics. (Gioia, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Igor Chveda from Supreme Court, Erie County, case number 808100/2019. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0209-3649275), filed by Igor Chveda. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Appendix Index)(Gioia, Michael) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution(KLH) |
| Case assigned to Hon. Geoffrey Crawford. Notification to chambers of on-line civil opening. (KLH) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (KLH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
