Cobb v. Wolcott
| 1:2020cv00496 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and temporary restraining order; granting 13 Motion to Dismiss the petition; the Court denies a certificate of appealability and the Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Signed by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 6/24/20. (SG)
|
|
Filing
12
DECISION AND ORDER that Respondent's 9 motion to convert the petition is GRANTED; that Cobb's 6 11 motions for judgment on the pleadings and default judgment are DENIED; that the Clerk of Court shall update the docket to reflect that Cobb's petition was filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and shall mail Cobb a copy of Dkt. 9, along with a copy of this decision and order. Signed by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 5/29/2020. (KLH)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cobb v. Wolcott | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
