Arnone v. Knab
Plaintiff: Susan Arnone
Defendant: David Knab
Case Number: 1:2021cv00072
Filed: January 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Michael J Roemer
Referring Judge: Lawrence J Vilardo
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER. The parties are hereby directed to jointly complete and email to chambers, roemer@nywd.uscourts.gov, the attached case management order. Such shall be completed within 30 days of the date of this Text Order. The Court will issue a final case management order upon receipt and review of the proposed deadlines. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Michael J. Roemer on 3/11/2021. (RAZ)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jocelyn Cibinskas on behalf of David Knab (Cibinskas, Jocelyn)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT REFERRAL ORDER - Hon. Michael J. Roemer, United States Magistrate Judge, is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall not hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), unless further ordered by this Court. All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 2/22/2021. (CMD)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order ADR Plan electronically forwarded to attorneys. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(SG)
January 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by David Knab.(Poling, Kristin)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by David Knab re #3 Continuation of Exhibits, (Poling, Kristin)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by David Knab. to #1 Notice of Removal, Index identifying each document filed and served in the state court action filed by David Knab. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Affidavit of Service, #3 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit 4 - Exhibit to Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Poling, Kristin)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JD)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (JD)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(JD)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by David Knab. to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by David Knab. (Poling, Kristin)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order E-Filing Notification: Attorney is directed to file a civil cover sheet, pursuant to Local Rule 3. No judge assignment will be made until filing is entered on the docket. Please utilize the Continuation of Exhibits event, located within the Responses and Replies category. (JD)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order E-Filing Notification: Attorney is directed to file an index identifying State Court documents pursuant to local rule 81(A). (JD)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by David Knab from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Erie, case number 816047/2020. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0209-4114077), filed by David Knab. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons &Complaint)(Poling, Kristin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arnone v. Knab
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Arnone
Represented By: Scott M. Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Knab
Represented By: Kristin E. Poling
Represented By: Jocelyn Cibinskas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?