Phoenix Asset Group, LLC v. URS Solutions LLC et al
| Phoenix Asset Group, LLC |
| Gassan Rizek, URS Solutions LLC, Niagara Restitution Service, LLC, Yamal Ramirez and Niagara Restitution Services, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00382 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| H Kenneth Schroeder |
| Lawrence J Vilardo |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Partial Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims) by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Christopher McMaster, #2 Exhibit Defendants' Answer, #3 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #4 Memorandum in Support Memorandum of Law in Support)(McMaster, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 15
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. (McMaster, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 14
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. URS Solutions LLC served on 3/27/2021, answer due 4/19/2021. (McMaster, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 13
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. Niagara Restitution Services, Inc. served on 3/24/2021, answer due 4/14/2021. (McMaster, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. URS Solutions LLC served on 3/17/2021, answer due 4/7/2021. (McMaster, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER regarding issuance of Case Management Order. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder Jr. on 4/16/21. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Order Form, #2 Consent Memorandum, #3 Consent Form)(LMG)
|
|
Filing 10
TEXT REFERRAL ORDER - Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall not hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), unless further ordered by this Court. All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 4/16/2021. (CMD)
|
|
ADR Plan electronically forwarded to attorneys. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(SG)
|
|
E-Filing Notification: #9 ANSWER and First COUNTERCLAIM against Plaintiff by Gassan Rizek, Niagara Restitution Services, Inc., URS Solutions LLC, Yamal Ramirez. Modified on 4/16/2021 to correct counter-defendant from defendants to plaintiff. (SG). (SG)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, #3 Amended Complaint , ANSWER to #1 Complaint, #3 Amended Complaint , First COUNTERCLAIM against Plaintiff by Gassan Rizek, Niagara Restitution Services, Inc., URS Solutions LLC, Yamal Ramirez.(Shatkin, Marc) Modified on 4/16/2021 to correct counter-defendant (SG).
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. Gassan Rizek served on 3/25/2021, answer due 4/15/2021. (McMaster, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. Yamal Ramirez served on 3/25/2021, answer due 4/15/2021. (McMaster, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. Yamal Ramirez served on 3/18/2021, answer due 4/8/2021. (McMaster, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. Gassan Rizek served on 3/16/2021, answer due 4/6/2021. (McMaster, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Niagara Restitution Services, Inc.. (SG)
|
|
Filing 3
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons to Niagara Restitution Services, Inc.)(McMaster, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Niagara Restitution Service, LLC, Yamal Ramirez, Gassan Rizek, URS Solutions LLC. (JD)
|
|
Case Assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (JD)
|
|
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(JD)
|
|
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JD)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants $ 402 receipt number 0209-4182486, filed by Phoenix Asset Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(McMaster, Christopher)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
