Green v. Noeth et al
Plaintiff: Antwan Green
Defendant: Mr. J. Noeth and Mr. S. White
Case Number: 1:2021cv00523
Filed: April 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J Vilardo
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2021 Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #5 MOTION for Extension of Time. Green may reopen this case by notifying the Court in writing within 45 days of the date of this order and must include either (a) a properly-supported motion to proceedin forma pauperis along with the required certification of Green's inmate trust fund account (or institutional equivalent) and authorization form or (b) the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee ($402.00 total). Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 05/27/2021. (SAV) (Chambers mailed a copy of this text order to the pro se plaintiff)
May 26, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time by Antwan Green. (CGJ)
April 23, 2021 Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of J. Noeth, S. White against Antwan Green. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 4/23/2021. (CGJ) Copy mailed to Plaintiff
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the case shall be administratively terminated. If the plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify this Court, in writing, no later than 30 days from the date of this order. This writing must include either (a) a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required certification of the plaintiff's inmate trust fund account (or the institutional equivalent) and authorization form or (b) the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee ($402.00 total). Upon the plaintiff's submission of either (a) a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required certification and authorization form, or (b) the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee ($402.00 total), the Clerk of Court shall reopen this case. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 4/22/2021. (CGJ) Copy of order, in forma pauperis motion form and authorization form mailed to Plaintiff
April 20, 2021 Remark: Plaintiff has been mailed a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, and a civil case timeline. (CGJ)
April 15, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antwan Green. (CGJ)
April 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J. Noeth, S. White, filed by Antwan Green. (CGJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green v. Noeth et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. J. Noeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. S. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antwan Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?