Blachowicz et al v. Kinetic Solutions Inc.
| Karen Blachowicz and Antoinette Suchenko |
| Kinetic Solutions Inc. dba Rabbit Air and Kinetic Solutions Inc. doing business as Rabbit Air |
| 1:2021cv00546 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| H Kenneth Schroeder |
| William M Skretny |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER regarding issuance of Case Management Order. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder Jr. on 6/7/21. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Order Form, #2 Consent Memorandum, #3 Consent Form)(LMG)
|
| Filing 6 TEXT REFERRAL ORDER. Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall not hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), unless further ordered by this Court. All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. SO ORDERED. Issued by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 6/4/2021. (JCM) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Kinetic Solutions Inc..(Lynett, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kinetic Solutions Inc.. (Lynett, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Karen Blachowicz, Antoinette Suchenko. Kinetic Solutions Inc. served on 5/13/2021, answer due 6/3/2021. (Sweet, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Kinetic Solutions Inc. (SG) |
| Case assigned to Hon. William M. Skretny. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (SG) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(SG) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (SG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kinetic Solutions Inc. dba Rabbit Air $ 402 receipt number 0209-4227596, filed by Karen Blachowicz, Antoinette Suchenko. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Sweet, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
