Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Priority Radio, Inc.
Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
Priority Radio, Inc. |
1:2021cv00587 |
May 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Leslie G Foschio |
John L Sinatra |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. to #15 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting [Proposed] Order filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Haskins, Matthew) |
Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Haskins, Matthew) |
Filing 14 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Matthew J. Haskins; granting #13 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Jeffrey D. Cohen. Issued by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 6/21/2021. (SDW)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 13 MOTION to appear pro hac vice Jeffrey D. Cohen, Esq. ( Filing fee $ 200 receipt number 0209-4280058.) by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Application, #2 Sponsoring Attorney Affidavit, #3 Attorney's Oath (Jeffrey D. Cohen), #4 Attorney Database & Electronic Filing Registration Form)(Rufo, James) |
Filing 12 MOTION to appear pro hac vice ( Filing fee $ 200 receipt number 0209-4280047.) by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Application, #2 Sponsoring Attorney Affidavit, #3 Attorney's Oath (Matthew J. Haskins), #4 Attorney Database & Electronic Filing Registration Form)(Rufo, James) |
Filing 11 ORDER. Scheduling TeleConference set for 7/20/2021 11:30 AM before Hon. Leslie G. Foschio. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 6/3/2021. (SDW)(Teleconference instructions emailed to parties 6/3/2021) |
Filing 10 TEXT REFERRAL ORDER (DISPOSITIVE) - Hon. Leslie G. Foschio, United States Magistrate Judge, is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall also hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 6/2/2021. (KLH) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 6/1/2021. (KEF)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 8 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by Priority Radio, Inc.. to #6 MOTION to appear pro hac vice for Jessica A. Kubisiak, Esq. ( Filing fee $ 200 receipt number 0209-4261186.) Attorney Sponsor Affidavit filed by Priority Radio, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 attorney electronic database)(Oppenheimer, Randolph) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Priority Radio, Inc..(Oppenheimer, Randolph) |
Filing 6 MOTION to appear pro hac vice for Jessica A. Kubisiak, Esq. ( Filing fee $ 200 receipt number 0209-4261186.) by Priority Radio, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attorney sponsor affirmation, #2 Petition for Pro Hac admission, #3 Attorney Oath, #4 Appendix to Attorney Oath, #5 Attorney Database registration)(Oppenheimer, Randolph) |
E-Filing Notification regarding #6 MOTION to appear pro hac vice. Incorrect.pdf file attached to entry. Filer directed to file the Attorney Database Registration form and the Sponsoring Affidavit using the (Continuation of Exhibits) event. (KM) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Randolph C. Oppenheimer on behalf of Priority Radio, Inc. (Oppenheimer, Randolph) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Priority Radio, Inc. served on 5/10/2021, answer due 6/1/2021. (Hubner, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Priority Radio, Inc.. (BK) |
Case Assigned to Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr.. (BK) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution. (BK) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (BK) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation for Norfolk Southern Railway Company.. (Hubner, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Priority Radio, Inc. $ 402 receipt number 0209-4238328, filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit Proposed Summons)(Hubner, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.