Hernandez Arellano v. Garland et al
Abigail Hernandez Arellano |
Attorney General Merrick B Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Thomas E. Feeley, Sheriff Patrick A Russo, US Department of Homeland Security, US Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Merrick B Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas E. Feeley and Patrick A Russo |
1:2021cv00787 |
July 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred to Rochester under case number 21cv6478. All future docketing shall be entered on the Rochester case. Civil case terminated and case closed as an unreportable closing on JS 6 statistics. (JLV) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0209-4297291.), filed by Abigail Hernandez Arellano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex A - Petitioner's Psychological Eval, #3 Exhibit Ex B - Summary Order 6.22.2021, #4 Exhibit Ex C - PSR 7.18.2018, #5 Exhibit Ex D - 2021 Johnson Memo, #6 Exhibit Ex E - Petitioner's request to ICE 3.10.2021, #7 Exhibit Ex F - ICE denial 3.12.2021, #8 Exhibit Ex G - ICE denial 6.24.2021, #9 Exhibit Ex H - Ltr from E. Flores 7.10.2019, #10 Exhibit Ex I - Letters of Support)(Marszalkowski, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.