Pinkowski v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff: James Pinkowski
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Case Number: 1:2021cv00792
Filed: July 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: William M Skretny
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2021 Case transferred to District of Massachusetts as case 1:21-cv-11207, filed 7/27/2021. (KM)
July 26, 2021 Filing 6 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER to the District Court of Massachusetts. Signed by John W. Nichols,Clerk of the Panel on 7/26/2021. (KM)
July 22, 2021 Case Stayed (SG)
July 22, 2021 Filing 5 TEXT ORDER. The #4 Stipulation to Stay Proceedings through and including September 7, 2021 is HEREBY SO ORDERED. Issued by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 7/22/2021. (JCM)
July 16, 2021 Filing 4 STIPULATION to Stay Proceedings Pending Final Determination by Judicial Panel of Multidistrict Litigation by Howmedica Osteonics Corp.. (Asfendis, Paul)
July 14, 2021 Notified Multi-District Litigation Panel of potential tag-along case. (TMK)
July 14, 2021 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK)
July 14, 2021 AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK)
July 14, 2021 Case Assigned to Hon. William M. Skretny. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK)
July 13, 2021 Filing 3 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by Howmedica Osteonics Corp.. to #1 Notice of Removal, Index of State Court Filings filed by Howmedica Osteonics Corp.. (Asfendis, Paul)
July 13, 2021 E-Filing Notification: re #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL - Action Required: Attorney is directed to file an index identifying State Court documents pursuant to local rule 81(A). (TMK)
July 12, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Howmedica Osteonics Corp. identifying Corporate Parent Stryker Corporation for Howmedica Osteonics Corp... (Asfendis, Paul)
July 12, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Howmedica Osteonics Corp. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Chautauqua, case number EK12021000154. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0209-4298681), filed by Howmedica Osteonics Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate of Service)(Asfendis, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pinkowski v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Pinkowski
Represented By: Theresa M. Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Represented By: Paul Edward Asfendis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?