Pinkowski v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
James Pinkowski |
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. |
1:2021cv00792 |
July 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
William M Skretny |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred to District of Massachusetts as case 1:21-cv-11207, filed 7/27/2021. (KM) |
Filing 6 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER to the District Court of Massachusetts. Signed by John W. Nichols,Clerk of the Panel on 7/26/2021. (KM) |
Case Stayed (SG) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER. The #4 Stipulation to Stay Proceedings through and including September 7, 2021 is HEREBY SO ORDERED. Issued by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 7/22/2021. (JCM) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION to Stay Proceedings Pending Final Determination by Judicial Panel of Multidistrict Litigation by Howmedica Osteonics Corp.. (Asfendis, Paul) |
Notified Multi-District Litigation Panel of potential tag-along case. (TMK) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK) |
Case Assigned to Hon. William M. Skretny. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
Filing 3 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by Howmedica Osteonics Corp.. to #1 Notice of Removal, Index of State Court Filings filed by Howmedica Osteonics Corp.. (Asfendis, Paul) |
E-Filing Notification: re #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL - Action Required: Attorney is directed to file an index identifying State Court documents pursuant to local rule 81(A). (TMK) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Howmedica Osteonics Corp. identifying Corporate Parent Stryker Corporation for Howmedica Osteonics Corp... (Asfendis, Paul) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Howmedica Osteonics Corp. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Chautauqua, case number EK12021000154. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0209-4298681), filed by Howmedica Osteonics Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate of Service)(Asfendis, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pinkowski v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Pinkowski | |
Represented By: | Theresa M. Walsh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | |
Represented By: | Paul Edward Asfendis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.