United for Amherst et al v. Zellner et al
| Commissioner Jeremy Zellner and Commissioner Ralph M. Mohr |
| United for Amherst, Ray Herman, Jay Dispisquale, Daniel Rider, Brian Rusk, Marshall Wood and Dan Rider |
| 1:2021cv00958 |
| August 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| H Kenneth Schroeder |
| Lawrence J Vilardo |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER regarding issuance of Case Management Order. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder Jr. on 10/6/21. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Order Form, #2 Consent Memorandum, #3 Consent Form)(LMG)
|
| Filing 4 TEXT REFERRAL ORDER - Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall not hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), unless further ordered by this Court. All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 10/6/2021. (CMD) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Ralph M. Mohr, Jeremy Zellner.(Toth, Jeremy) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ralph M. Mohr, Jeremy Zellner Index of State Documents filed with Docket #1 Notice of Removal from New York State Supreme Court, case number 811522/2021. (Toth, Jeremy) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK) |
| E-Filing Notification: re #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL - Action Required: Attorney is directed to file an index identifying State Court documents pursuant to local rule 81(A). (TMK) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ralph M. Mohr, Jeremy Zellner from New York State Supreme Court, case number 811522/2021. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0209-4340450), filed by Ralph M. Mohr, Jeremy Zellner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Toth, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
