Cimato v. United States Postal Service
Plaintiff: Antonina Cimato
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Case Number: 1:2021cv00995
Filed: September 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J Vilardo
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2021 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Mary Claire Fowler on 9/28/21, filed by Antonina Cimato. (Earl, Boyd)
October 5, 2021 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Kimberly A. Herbst, Supervisor Tort Claims United States Postal Service on 9/17/21, filed by Antonina Cimato. (Earl, Boyd)
October 5, 2021 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on United States Postal Service on 9/17/21, filed by Antonina Cimato. (Earl, Boyd)
October 5, 2021 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General on 9/17/21, filed by Antonina Cimato. (Earl, Boyd)
September 24, 2021 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on USPS District Manager on 9/17/21, filed by Antonina Cimato. (Earl, Boyd)
September 10, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States Postal Service. (JHF)
September 9, 2021 Filing 3 Original Summons Filed. (Earl, Boyd)
September 8, 2021 E-Filing Notification regarding #2 Original Summons Filed: Summons incomplete. ACTION REQUIRED: refer to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 4 for Summons requirements and information on serving the United States. Re-file completed original summonses. (LB)
September 7, 2021 Filing 2 Original Summons Filed. (Earl, Boyd)
September 3, 2021 Case assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to chambers of on-line civil case opening. (JHF)
September 3, 2021 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JHF)
September 3, 2021 E-Filing Notification: No summonses included with case opening documents. Required Attorney follow-up: electronically file summonses to be issued by Clerk of Court. (JHF)
September 3, 2021 AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution. (JHF)
September 2, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Postal Service $ 402 receipt number 0209-4349581, filed by Antonina Cimato. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit)(Earl, Boyd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cimato v. United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonina Cimato
Represented By: Boyd L. Earl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?