Turner v. Sewalt et al
| Christopher Turner |
| Timothy Sewalt, Corey May, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Megan V. Naida, Jamie Knowles, Mark J. Belloma, Walter W. Belloma, Brian A. Eno, Patrick J. Moffe, III, Adam A. Parks, Brian J. Evans, Daniel J. Mazzaraco, Michael A. Randall, Joseph Ricciardelli, John J. Ricciardelli, Shannon M. Keeney, Misty O'Dell and John G. Rich |
| 1:2021cv01013 |
| September 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| John L Sinatra |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter from Christopher Turner, dated 9/16/2021, to Kirstie Henry (CGJ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Service by US Marshal by Christopher Turner. (CGJ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Turner. (CGJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark J. Belloma, Walter W. Belloma, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Brian A. Eno, Brian J. Evans, Shannon M. Keeney, Jamie Knowles, Corey May, Daniel J. Mazzaraco, Patrick J. Moffe, III, Megan V. Naida, Misty O'Dell, Adam A. Parks, Michael A. Randall, John J. Ricciardelli, Joseph Ricciardelli, John G. Rich, Timothy Sewalt, filed by Christopher Turner. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CGJ) |
| Remark: Plaintiff has been mailed a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, and a civil case timeline. (CGJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.