Greenwood v. Arthrex, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Leslie M. Greenwood
Defendant: Arthrex, Inc., TE Connectivity Corporation f/k/a Heat Shrink Innovations, LLC, Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC, TE Connectivity Corporation and Heat Shrink Innovations, LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv01101
Filed: October 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: William M Skretny
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 SCHEDULING NOTICE on #18 #20 Motions to Dismiss. Responses due by 12/13/2021. Replies due by 12/20/2021. Oral Argument will be scheduled by the Court, if necessary. (JCM)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER RULE 12(b)(6), MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2) by Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration)(Short, David)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 13) by Arthrex, Inc..(Goldstein, Philip)
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by TE Connectivity Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Vita, William)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 TEXT ORDER On October 28, 2021, Defendants TE Connectivity Corporation and Precision Edge Surgical Products Company, LLC #6 #7 moved to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint. Defendant Arthrex, Inc. filed an #8 answer. Plaintiff thereafter filed an #13 amended complaint. Because an amended complaint supersedes an original complaint and renders it of no legal effect, the #6 #7 motions to dismiss will be denied as moot. See Shields v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., 25 F.3d 1124, 1128 (2d Cir. 1994) ("It is well established that an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original, and renders it of no legal effect."); Thompson v. Pallito, 949 F. Supp. 2d 558, 582 (D.Vt. 2013) ("[M]otions addressed to the original complaint are generally regarded as moot upon the filing of an amended complaint.") (citing cases).IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that the #6 #7 Motions to Dismiss are DENIED AS MOOT.FURTHER, that Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's #13 Second Amended Complaint within 14 days of the entry date of this Text Order.SO ORDERED. Issued by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 11/12/2021. (JCM)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Second Amended Complaint served on Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC on 11/11/2021, filed by Leslie M. Greenwood. (Connelly, Andrew)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Second Amended Complaint served on TE Connectivity Corp on 11/11/2021, filed by Leslie M. Greenwood. (Connelly, Andrew)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Second Amended Complaint served on Arthrex, Inc. on 11/11/2021, filed by Leslie M. Greenwood. (Connelly, Andrew)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Leslie M. Greenwood. Second Amended Complaint. (Connelly, Andrew)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 TEXT ORDER -- IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Paul A. Williams's #11 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Issued by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 11/8/2021. (JCM)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to appear pro hac vice ( Filing fee $ 200 receipt number 0209-4408070.) by TE Connectivity Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Supplement PHV Motion, #2 Exhibit A-Admission Petition Form, #3 Exhibit B-Sponsor Affidavit, #4 Exhibit C-Attorney Oath, #5 Exhibit D- Principles & Guidelines Signature Page, #6 Exhibit E-ECF Registration)(Vita, William)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE on #6 #7 Motions to Dismiss. Responses are due by 11/12/2021. Replies are due by 11/19/2021. Oral Argument will be scheduled by the Court, if necessary. (JCM)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order ADR Plan electronically forwarded to attorneys. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(CGJ)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Arthrex, Inc.. (Goldstein, Philip)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Arthrex, Inc..(Goldstein, Philip)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim by Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC. Responses due by 11/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Todd Fewins, #2 Memorandum in Support of Precision Edge's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint)(Lucinski, Ryan)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by TE Connectivity Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Vita, William)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TE Connectivity Corporation identifying Corporate Parent TE Connectivity, Ltd for TE Connectivity Corporation.. (Vita, William)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC identifying Corporate Parent Colson Medical, LLC for Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC.. (Lucinski, Ryan)
October 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 TEXT ORDER -- IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that the parties' #2 stipulation is APPROVED. Defendants must respond to Plaintiff's complaint by October 28, 2021. SO ORDERED.Issued by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 10/18/2021. (JCM)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STIPULATION re #1 Notice of Removal, and Order for Extension of Time by Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC. (Lucinski, Ryan)
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order ATTENTION CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS: All Corporate Disclosure Statements pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1(b) are to be filed within seven (7) days of this notice. (KM)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Hon. William M. Skretny. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Notified Multi-District Litigation Panel of potential tag-along case. (TMK)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC from Erie County Supreme Court, case number 807377/2019. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0209-4383978), filed by Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lucinski, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greenwood v. Arthrex, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leslie M. Greenwood
Represented By: Andrew John Connelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arthrex, Inc.
Represented By: Philip A. Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TE Connectivity Corporation f/k/a Heat Shrink Innovations, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Precision Edge Surgical Products Company LLC
Represented By: Ryan J. Lucinski
Represented By: David A. Short
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TE Connectivity Corporation
Represented By: Paul A. Williams
Represented By: William E. Vita
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heat Shrink Innovations, LLC
Represented By: Paul A. Williams
Represented By: William E. Vita
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?