Boyd v. Gille et al
Raymond Boyd |
P. Gille, K. Arnold, Williams, D. Graff and Gulatti |
1:2022cv00596 |
August 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Lawrence J Vilardo |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Gulatti, Williams, D. Graff, K. Arnold, P. Gille against Raymond Boyd. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 8/9/22. (SG)This was mailed to: Plaintiff. |
Filing 3 ORDER case shall be administratively terminated; plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing no later than thirty days from the date of this order he wishes to reopen the action and shall include either a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis that includes a completed and signed Prison Certification or the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee; upon receipt of the new motion or the filing fee, the Clerk of Court shall re-open the case. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 8/8/22. (SG)This was mailed to: Plaintiff. |
Pro Se Packet Mailed to Plaintiff which included: Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, Civil Case Timeline. (SG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond Boyd.(SG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against K. Arnold, P. Gille, D. Graff, Gulatti, Williams, filed by Raymond Boyd.(SG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.