Davis v. National Grid USA Service Company, Inc. et al
| Mark A. Davis |
| National Grid USA Service Company, Inc and Andrea Pustulka |
| 1:2022cv00984 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Geoffrey Crawford |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to National Grid USA Service Company, Inc, Andrea Pustulka. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against All Defendants $ 402 receipt number ANYWDC-4751066, filed by MARK A. DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 NG Summons, #3 Pustulka Summons)(Korn, Lindy) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Geoffrey Crawford. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
