James v. City of Rochester et al
Shenea James |
City of Rochester, RPD Officer William Baker, RPD Investigator Richard Arrowood, RPD Officer 1-10 John Doe, Monroe County Sheriff Todd Baxter, MSCO Sergeant Christian DeVinney, Richard Roe Sheriff's Deputies and NYSP Investigator Jeffrey Ulatowski |
1:2023cv00054 |
January 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
E-Filing Notification: #3 MOTION to Dismiss; filed in error. All docketing should be entered on 23-CV-6057. (JLV) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by William Baker, Christian DeVinney, Jeffrey Ulatowski. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rebecca Smith, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit 1-4)(Cerrone, Michael) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert John Shoemaker on behalf of Monroe County Sheriff Todd Baxter (Shoemaker, Robert) |
Case opened in Buffalo in error and transferred to Rochester under case number 23-cv-6057. All future docketing shall be entered on the Rochester case. (TMK) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by William Baker, Christian DeVinney, Jeffrey Ulatowski from Monroe County Court, case number E2022010302., filed by William Baker, Christian DeVinney, Jeffrey Ulatowski. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit 1-6, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cerrone, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.