Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
| David C. Lettieri |
| Federal Bureau of Investigation |
| 1:2023cv00309 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Lawrence J Vilardo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David C. Lettieri. (JLV) |
| Filing 7 Letter from David C. Lettieri, to the Court. (CGJ) |
| Filing 6 CLERKS CERTIFICATE filed and electronically sent to Court of Appeals. (Attachments: #1 Index) (JLV) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order by David C. Lettieri. Filing status: Fee Due. (JLV) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Federal Bureau of Investigation against David C. Lettieri. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 4/12/2023. (JLV) This was mailed to: David C. Lettieri. |
Filing 3
ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this action without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee; that the Clerk of the Court shall send to the plaintiff a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting affirmation; that if the plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify this Court, in writing, no later than 30 days from the date of this order. This writing must include either (a) a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required certification of the plaintiff's inmate trust fund account (or the institutional equivalent) and authorization form or (b) the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee ($402.00 total); that upon the plaintiff's submission of either (a) a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required certification and authorization form, or (b) the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee ($402.00 total), the Clerk of the Court shall reopen this case. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 4/12/2023. (JLV)This was mailed to: David C. Lettieri, along with a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting affirmation.
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David C. Lettieri. (JLV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Investigation filed by David C. Lettieri. (JLV) |
| Plaintiff has been mailed a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, and a civil case timeline. (JLV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David C. Lettieri | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
