James v. City University of New York (CUNY) et al
| Dr. Nadine S. James |
| City University of New York (CUNY), SEEK Program, Walter Valero, Dr. Althea Forde, Angelia Pinnock-Halloway, Mr. Peter Baretto and Dr. Alberto Navarro |
| 1:2023cv00512 |
| June 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| John L Sinatra |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Letter from Dr. Nadine S. James, dated 6/7/2023, to Hon. Judge Wolford. (TMK) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nadine S. James. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Peter Baretto, City University of New York (CUNY), Althea Forde, Alberto Navarro, Angelia Pinnock-Halloway, SEEK Program, Walter Valero, filed by Nadine S. James. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK) |
| Remark: Plaintiff has been given a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, Pro Se Assistance Program Information, Civil Case Timeline and ADR Notification. (TMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
