Kellogg et al v. Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: DANIELLE L. KELLOGG and BRIANNE K. DEROSA
Defendant: TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK and Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2023cv00930
Filed: September 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Leslie G Foschio
Referring Judge: John L Sinatra
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER. Each party, including any party appearing for themselves without counsel, shall provide to the court, either jointly or separately, a proposed case management order not later than 11/21/2023 for the purpose of entry of a case management order as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b). Upon receipt of the proposed case management orders, a Scheduling Order will be prepared and filed by the court. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 10/12/2023. (SDW)
October 4, 2023 ADR Plan electronically forwarded to attorneys. The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK)
October 3, 2023 Filing 8 TEXT REFERRAL ORDER (DISPOSITIVE) - Hon. Leslie G. Foschio, United States Magistrate Judge, is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall also hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 10/3/2023. (KLH)
October 3, 2023 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company.(Henkin, Douglas)
September 29, 2023 E-Filing Notification: #6 MOTION to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Justine N. Margolis. ACTION REQUIRED: Attorney's Oath and Sponsoring Affidavit forms are not notarized. Refile using Docketing Event: Continuation of Exhibits. Also, L.R. Civ. P. 83.2(a)(1) requires pro hac vice attorneys to obtain local counsel or submit a motion for waiver of that requirement. (NRE)
September 28, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Justine N. Margolis ( Filing fee $ 200 receipt number ANYWDC-4986989.) by Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Henkin, Douglas)
September 12, 2023 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Talcott Resolution Life, Inc. for Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company.. (Henkin, Douglas)
September 11, 2023 ATTENTION ALL PARTIES OR INTERVENORS: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and/or General Order No. 157 In the Matter of Disclosure of Members, Shareholders, Partners, and Leaders of Business Organization Parties, all Disclosure Statements are to be filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. (KM)
September 9, 2023 Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by 10/3/2023. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 9/9/2023. (KEF)
September 8, 2023 Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to the Complaint until October 3, 2023 by Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company.(Henkin, Douglas)
September 6, 2023 Case Assigned to Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK)
September 6, 2023 AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at #http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(TMK)
September 6, 2023 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK)
September 5, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK identifying Corporate Parent Talcott Resolution Life, Inc for TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK.. (Henkin, Douglas)
September 5, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK from Supreme Court of the State of New York, Erie County, case number 810100/2023. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYWDC-4967741), filed by TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Henkin, Douglas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kellogg et al v. Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DANIELLE L. KELLOGG
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Carlino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRIANNE K. DEROSA
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Carlino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Represented By: Douglas W. Henkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Douglas W. Henkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?