Aguirre v. Doe #1 et al
| Jairo Aguirre |
| John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Joey Clinton and John Doe #3 |
| 1:2023cv01240 |
| November 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| John L Sinatra |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by Jairo Aguirre. Ordered that Aguirre is directed to provide the Court with a signed and dated copy of the complaint by February 20, 2024. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide Aguirre with a copy of his filed complaint (Dkt. 1) for him to sign, date, and return to the Court. If Aguirre does not provide a signed and dated copy of the complaint by February 20, 2024, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case as dismissed without prejudice without further order of the Court. Signed by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 1/16/2024. (TMK)This was mailed to: Jairo Aguirre.Clerk to Follow up
|
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of New York Northern; Case Number 9:23-cv-01365. |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a), the Clerk of the Court transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on November 30, 2023. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas ) [Transferred from nynd on 11/30/2023.]
|
| Remark: Plaintiff has been mailed a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, and a civil case timeline. (CGJ) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on November 22, 2023. {text order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas) [Transferred from nynd on 11/30/2023.] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jairo Aguirre(nas) [Transferred from nynd on 11/30/2023.] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that, if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, either (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full; or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP application. Signed by US District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on November 3, 2023. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas) [Transferred from nynd on 11/30/2023.]
|
| Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Jairo Aguirre. (nas ) [Transferred from nynd on 11/30/2023.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jairo Aguirre(nas) [Transferred from nynd on 11/30/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joey Clinton, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 filed by Jairo Aguirre. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 envelope)(nas) [Transferred from nynd on 11/30/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
