Anderson v. State of New York et al
Plaintiff: Terrance R. Anderson
Defendant: State of New York, City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department, Detective Paul Ramano, Investigator Rohr, John Doe, Sergant Monk and Sgt Team
Case Number: 1:2024cv00087
Filed: January 24, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: John L Sinatra
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2024 Filing 8 Letter from Terrance Anderson, dated 3/6/24, to Clerk, US District Court. (JLV) Status letter sent to pro se plaintiff.
February 12, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terrance R. Anderson. (JLV)
January 30, 2024 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. ProSe packet sent to Terrance R. Anderson. (JLV)
January 26, 2024 Filing 5 JUDGMENT in favor of City of Rochester, Monk, Rochester Police Department, Rohr, Sgt Team, State of New York, John Doe, Paul Ramano against Terrance R. Anderson. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 1/26/2024. (JLV) This was mailed to: Terrance R. Anderson along with an IFP motion form and authorization form.
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this action without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee; that the Clerk of Court shall send to plaintiff a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting affirmation; that if the plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify this Court, in writing, no later than February 26, 2024; that the writing must include either (1) a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required certification of the plaintiff's inmate trust fund account (or the institutional equivalent) and authorization form or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $55.00 administrative fee ($405.00 total); that upon plaintiff's submission of either (1) a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required certification and authorization form, or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $55.00 administrative fee ($405.00 total), the Clerk of Court shall reopen this case. Signed by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 1/26/2024. (JLV)This was mailed to: Terrance R. Anderson.
January 24, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terrance R. Anderson. (JLV)
January 24, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Rochester, John Doe, Monk, Paul Ramano, Rochester Police Department, Rohr, Sgt Team, State of New York filed by Terrance R. Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope) (JLV)
January 24, 2024 Plaintiff has been mailed a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, and a civil case timeline. (JLV)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. State of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrance R. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Rochester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rochester Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective Paul Ramano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Investigator Rohr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sergant Monk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt Team
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?