Sevinsky et al v. County of Cattaraugus et al
| Elizabeth Sevinsky, Ryan Brickman, Michelle Tirone Coladangelo and Stephen Tirone |
| County of Cattaraugus and Matt Keller |
| 1:2024cv00186 |
| March 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| John L Sinatra |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter from attorney, George F. Carpinello, to Judge Sintara regarding a potential MDL transfer to the Northern District of New York. (JLV) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER approving #7 stipulation for extension of time. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by 5/10/2024. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 4/11/2024. (NAK) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Stipulation and Order for Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by County of Cattaraugus, Matt Keller. (Knights, Aaron) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob J Honan on behalf of County of Cattaraugus, Matt Keller (Honan, Jacob) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron W. Knights on behalf of County of Cattaraugus, Matt Keller (Knights, Aaron) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stephen Tirone, Elizabeth Sevinsky, Michelle Tirone Coladangelo, Ryan Brickman. Matt Keller served on 3/20/2024, answer due 4/10/2024. (Giglio, David) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stephen Tirone, Elizabeth Sevinsky, Michelle Tirone Coladangelo, Ryan Brickman. County of Cattaraugus served on 3/20/2024, answer due 4/10/2024. (Giglio, David) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to County of Cattaraugus, Matt Keller. (TMK) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov.' Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Sevinsky et al v County of Cattaraugus et al (Cattaraugus) against County of Cattaraugus, Matt Keller $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5120989, filed by Stephen Tirone, Elizabeth Sevinsky, Michelle Tirone Coladangelo, Ryan Brickman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Proposed Summons)(Giglio, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
