Smith v. County of Niagara et al
| Paul Smith |
| County of Niagara, Kyle R. Andrews in his official capacity as treasurer for Niagara County and Kyle R. Andrews |
| 1:2024cv00207 |
| March 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Lawrence J Vilardo |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Kyle R. Andrews, County of Niagara. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Memorandum in Support)(Crosby, Brian) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Smith. Kyle R. Andrews served on 3/19/2024, answer due 4/9/2024. (Giglio, David) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Smith. County of Niagara served on 3/19/2024, answer due 4/9/2024. (Giglio, David) |
| Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting motion for an extension of time to answer filed by the defendants, Docket Item #6 . The defendants shall answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the complaint by 4/19/2024. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 3/22/2024. (CRT) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Kyle R. Andrews, County of Niagara.(Morton, Melissa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Elisha D. Teibel on behalf of Kyle R. Andrews, County of Niagara (Teibel, Elisha) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian P. Crosby on behalf of Kyle R. Andrews, County of Niagara (Crosby, Brian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa M. Morton on behalf of Kyle R. Andrews, County of Niagara (Morton, Melissa) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Kyle R. Andrews, County of Niagara. (TMK) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov.' Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Smith against County of Niagara, Kyle R. Andrews in his official capacity as treasurer for Niagara County $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5125839, filed by Paul Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Proposed Summons)(Giglio, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
