James v. Wojtaszek et al
Johnny Calixte-James |
Hon. Judge Caroline A. Wojtaszek, Carrington Crossley, Niagara County District Attorney's Office, Niagara County Sheriff's Office Drug Task Force, Brian D. Seaman and All Known and Unknown Law Enforcement |
1:2024cv00211 |
March 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
John L Sinatra |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number 100004489 (CGJ) |
Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has until May 9, 2024, to either (1) show cause why his application to proceed IFP should not be denied or (2) pay the $405.00 in filing fees. If Plaintiff does not respond to this Order, or pay the $405.00 in filing fees, by May 9, 2024, this case will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 4/9/2024. (CGJ)This was mailed to: Johnny Calixte-James. |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Johnny Calixte James. (CGJ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Known and Unknown Law Enforcement, Carrington Crossley, Niagara County District Attorney's Office, Niagara County Sheriff's Office Drug Task Force, Brian D. Seaman, Caroline A. Wojtaszek, filed by Johnny Calixte James. (CGJ) |
Remark: Plaintiff has been mailed a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, Pro Se Assistance Program Information and ADR Notification. (CGJ) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov.' Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan.(CGJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.