Anterline v. Walmart Inc.
Cheryl Anterline |
Walmart Inc. |
1:2024cv00236 |
March 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Leslie G Foschio |
Elizabeth A Wolford |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 6 DISCOVERY PLAN by Walmart Inc..(Will, Pauline) |
Filing 5 Stipulation-Selection of Mediator by Walmart Inc.. (Will, Pauline) |
|
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hon. Leslie G. Foschio for all pretrial matters excluding dispositive motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 3/22/24. (SG) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Walmart Inc.. (Will, Pauline) |
Case assigned to Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (SG) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (SG) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov.' Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan.(SG) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart Inc. from Niagara County Supreme Court, case number E181676/2023. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5132737), filed by Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit Ex. A, #3 Exhibit Ex. B, #4 Exhibit Ex. C, #5 Exhibit Ex. D, #6 Exhibit Ex. E, #7 Exhibit Ex. F, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Will, Pauline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Anterline v. Walmart Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cheryl Anterline | |
Represented By: | John C. Murrett, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Walmart Inc. | |
Represented By: | Pauline Costanzo Will |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.