Ayesh et al v. Garland et al
| Ashwaq Alawi Ayesh and Khaled Alawi Elzahiri |
| Mr. Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 1:2024cv00254 |
| March 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS to #3 MOTION to appear pro hac vice ( Filing fee $ 200 receipt number ANYWDC-5136973.) . (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Supplement Civility Oath, #3 Supplement E-filing registration, #4 Supplement Petition for Admission, #5 Supplement Signed Sponsor Affidavit)(Borowski, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to appear pro hac vice ( Filing fee $ 200 receipt number ANYWDC-5136973.) by Ashwaq Alawi Ayesh, Khaled Alawi Elzahiri.(Borowski, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons Filed. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons, #2 Supplement Summons, #3 Supplement Summons)(Borowski, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5136950, filed by Ashwaq Alawi Ayesh, Khaled Alawi Elzahiri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E)(Borowski, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
