Ralicki v. Lancaster Police Department et al
| Niccole Ralicki |
| Eric Major, Jane Doe, Garrett Szypylman, Lancaster Police, Bryan Asposto, Nash Braun, Lancaster Police Department and Town of Lancaster |
| 1:2024cv00976 |
| October 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| H Kenneth Schroeder |
| John L Sinatra |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SCHEDULING/CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Please Note: This docket text may not contain the entire contents of the attached Order. It is your responsibility to read the attached Order and download it for future reference. Direct any questions to the Chambers of the Judge who entered this Order.) Mandatory Disclosures due by 11/26/2024; Stipulation of Selection of Mediator due by 12/16/2024; Motions to Join Parties/Amend Pleadings due by 1/6/2025; First Mediation Session due by 1/31/2025; Motions to Compel Discovery due by 4/4/2025; Discovery completed by 4/30/2025; ; Plaintiff Expert Witness ID due by 5/30/2025; Defendant Expert Witness ID due by 7/31/2025; Dispositive Motions due by 11/17/2025; Mediation To End by 12/12/2025. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder Jr. on 11/8/2024. (LMG) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Pretrial Order Scheduling Order by Lancaster Police, Lancaster Police Department, Town of Lancaster, Eric Major, Garrett Szypylman, Nash Braun, Bryan Asposto, Jane Doe. (Rodgers, Jennifer) |
Filing 5
ORDER regarding issuance of Case Management Order. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder Jr. on 10/22/24. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Order Form, #2 Consent Memorandum, #3 Consent Form)(LMG)
|
| Filing 4 TEXT REFERRAL ORDER (DISPOSITIVE) - Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall also hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 10/22/2024. (KLH)This was mailed to: Counsel for Plaintiff. |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Bryan Asposto, Nash Braun, Jane Doe, Lancaster Police, Lancaster Police Department, Eric Major, Garrett Szypylman, Town of Lancaster re #2 Answer to Complaint (Rodgers, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint by Bryan Asposto, Nash Braun, Jane Doe, Lancaster Police, Lancaster Police Department, Eric Major, Garrett Szypylman, Town of Lancaster.(Rodgers, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Erie County Supreme Court, case number 809457/2024. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5304771), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Jury Trial Demand, #11 Certificate of Service, #12 Certificate of Service)(Rodgers, Jennifer) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov. Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
