Luk v. Bestine
| Jodi Luk |
| Katherine J. Bestine |
| 1:2024cv00993 |
| October 17, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York |
| John L Sinatra |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jodi Luk. (CGJ) |
| Clerks Office mailed Copy of the 2 Text Order, along with a blank in forma pauperis application form to Plaintiff. (TMK) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ORDER: By November 20, 2024, Plaintiff shall either pay the required $405 filing fee or, if Plaintiff would like an opportunity to substantiate financial hardship, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis detailing Plaintiff's financial circumstances. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the required filing fee or submit a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis by November 20, 2024, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to administratively terminate this action without filing the Complaint or assessing a filing fee. The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of this Text Order, along with a blank in forma pauperis application form. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 10/21/2024. (KLH)Clerk to Follow up |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov. Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan.(JLV) |
| Plaintiff did not include the filing fee or IFP motion in submission. (JLV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Katherine J. Bestine filed by Jodi Luk. (JLV) |
| Plaintiff has been mailed a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, Pro Se Assistance Program Information, Civil Case Timeline and ADR Notification. (JLV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Luk v. Bestine | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jodi Luk | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Katherine J. Bestine | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
