Suarez v. Keiser et al
Guarionex Suarez |
Dr. Keiser, Dr. Dobies, Thomas M. Poole, Lester Wright, Gregoire and Dr. E. Weissman |
6:2004cv06362 |
August 2, 2004 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
Seneca |
Charles J. Siragusa |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 DECISION AND ORDER denying 79 Motion for Preliminary Injunction.Plaintiffs motion [#68] for injunctive relief, seeking an order that he be provided with particular medical treatments, is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Plaintiffs motion [#68]. Plaintiffs application [#79] for injunctive relief, seeking a transfer, is also denied. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 6/22/10. (KAP) |
Filing 74 DECISION AND ORDER denying 68 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and reserving in part; denying 73 Motion for injunctive relief. Plaintiffs motion [#73] for injunctive relief related to his deportation is denied. Plaintiffs other motion [#68] for injunctive relief is denied in part, to the extent that it seeks a transfer based on alleged harassment by corrections staff. The Court reserves decision on the remainder of the motion [#68] relating to the alleged denial of medical care. Defendants shall file and serve a further response to the application consistent with this Decision and Order on or before April 30, 2010.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 4/26/10. (KAP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.