Crown Castle USA Inc. et al v. Fred A. Nudd Corporation et al
| 6:2005cv06163 |
| April 8, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Marian W. Payson |
| Michael A. Telesca |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
250
ORDER dismissing case with prejudice. Clerk to close case. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on November 10, 2011. (MES)
|
|
Filing
246
ORDER granting 239 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on December 29, 2010. (Kilian, Mary)
|
|
Filing
241
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 186 Motion for Sanctions; granting in part and denying in part 193 Motion for Sanctions; adopting Report and Recommendations re 229 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on October 14, 2010. (Kilian, Mary)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 128 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on February 12, 2009.(Herrero-Jaarsma, Maria)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crown Castle USA Inc. et al v. Fred A. Nudd Corporation et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
