Shariff et al v. Allah et al
Case Number: 6:2005cv06504
Filed: September 7, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
Presiding Judge: Jonathan W. Feldman
Presiding Judge: Charles J. Siragusa
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 213 DECISION AND ORDER granting 172 Motion to Certify Class. After reviewing the third amended complaint and the memoranda of law, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs have met the criteria for class certification under Rule 23. Further, the Court is n ot persuaded that the limitations expressed by Defendants, with the exception of limiting the class to declaratory and injunctive relief, are necessary. Therefore, the Court certifies the following class: "Plaintiffs and all prisoners in the cus tody of the New York State Department of Correctional and Community Supervision who suffer from a mobility disability limiting one or more of the prisoners major life activities and that requires the use of a wheelchair." The Court finds no basis at this juncture to limit the class to only the facilities alleged in the complaint. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiffs' motion to certify, ECF No. 172.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/4/19. (KAP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shariff et al v. Allah et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?